Throughout
the continuous evolution of new species over time, coevolution has been a
mechanism for multiple species to selectively put pressure on each other,
thereby affecting each other’s evolution. It has influenced the evolution of
host species to stay resistant to parasites by reproducing sexually, which
allows a higher chance of immunity. The parasite is pressured to evolve in
response to have a better chance at infecting the host. This cycle continues as
demonstrated in the Red Queen’s hypothesis (Cronk & Ojeda 2008).
Additionally,
the Planalto hermit humming bird (Phaethornis pretrei) has coevolved a mutually
beneficial relationship with the ornithophilous flower (Beloperone californica) (Faria & Araujo, 2008).
The flowers itself are “characterized by having brightly colored (e.g. red or
yellow) odorless flowers, tubular and evenly curved corollas, diurnal anthesis
and sucrose-rich nectar” (Faria & Araujo, 2008). The plants have
morphologically co-adapted these traits overtime with the hummingbird.
Specifically, the flowers’ long and tubular shape appeals to hummingbirds because
the bird’s bills are oriented similarly, allowing them to easily probe these
flowers as opposed to other flowers (Cronk & Ojeda 2008). Over time, the plant species are
selectively pressured to evolve flowers that are more tubular in shape, so that
the hummingbirds will prefer to pollinate their flowers instead of other
plants. In turn, the hummingbird species morphologically co-adapt a more
similar shaped beak to fit smoothly into the flowers in order to get nectar.
The plants have also evolved to produce a higher volume of nectar with a higher
sugar production than other plants that are pollinated by insects to meet the
birds’ energy requirements (Cronk & Ojeda 2008). The co-evolution patterns go as far as the plants’
flowers’ colors evolving to suit the humming bird specie’s vision. Birds prefer
red pigmentation in flowers because they have a good sense of color
discrimination and spectral sensitivity at the red end of the visual spectrum (Faria & Araujo, 2008).
Therefore, the hummingbird has selectively pressured the plant species to
evolve more red-toned flowers over the course of many generations., which
encourages the hummingbird to take pollen from their flowers to reproduce
instead of other plants. The convolutions have gone as far as the blooming
times of the flower to coincide with hummingbird breeding seasons (Faria & Araujo, 2008).
Work Cited:
Cronk, Q., & Ojeda, I.
(2008, March 7). Bird-pollinated flowers in an evolutionary and
molecular
context. Retrieved October 19, 2014.
Faria, R., & Araujo, A.
(2009, August 31). Flowering phenology and pollination of
ornithophilous
species in two habitats of Serra da Bodoquena, Mato Grosso do
Sul, Brazil. Retrieved October 19, 2014.
Sul, Brazil. Retrieved October 19, 2014.
I had also posted regarding coevolution regarding flowers! Just as your ornithophilous flower has evolved to have red pigment to attract hummingbirds as pollinators, flowers that bees pollinate tend to be yellow, blue or ultraviolet. These are the only colors that bees can see, so bees will only pollinate the flowers that produce these colors. I find it very interesting that the flower you researched also produced a particular type of nectar that provided better nutritional value to the bird. This is a very specific example of coevolution that must have taken many years to develop.
ReplyDelete